I just had a birthday. The kind of birthday that doesn’t come with balloons or dramatic revelations, but instead arrives quietly, tapping you on the shoulder and asking you to notice a few things you’ve been politely ignoring. I noticed my knees first. They complain now when I walk too long, like old friends who have decided they no longer owe me silence. Then there was the breathlessness on the stairs, unexpected and mildly insulting. Nothing chronic, nothing diagnosable, nothing that would earn me much sympathy in a doctor’s waiting room. Just changes. Subtle, persistent, undeniable.
Years ago, a friend once told me that every birthday felt like her body was failing her a little more. She talked about joint pain, blurry vision, a general sense of things not working the way they used to. I remember responding immediately, confidently, and with the best of intentions: “Age is just a number.” I thought I was being encouraging. I thought I was offering perspective, maybe even hope. Looking back now, I realize I was also shutting something down.
Because age is not just a number when you live inside a body.
For a long time, we’ve treated ageing like a mindset problem. As though if you think young enough, stretch enough, drink enough green smoothies, and keep the right attitude, time will somehow lose interest in you. This idea is seductive, especially in cultures that worship productivity, youthfulness, and visible vitality. It allows us to believe that decline only happens to people who didn’t try hard enough.
But the truth is more complicated, and far less moral.
Ageing is a biological process that unfolds differently for everyone. This isn’t a poetic observation; it’s a scientific one. Long-running research such as the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, which began in 1958, has shown that people age at dramatically different rates across physical, cognitive, and metabolic domains. Two people born in the same year can have vastly different experiences of strength, endurance, vision, memory, and recovery, even if they share similar lifestyles. Ageing is shaped by genetics, early life conditions, stress exposure, socioeconomic factors, hormonal changes, and sheer randomness. Effort matters, but it is not the whole story.
So when we say “age is just a number,” what we are often really saying is: I’m more comfortable denying this than sitting with it.
The comment “Oh, you don’t look your age” lives in the same neighborhood. It’s meant as a compliment, but it carries a quiet assumption that looking your age would be a problem. That ageing has a look, and that look is undesirable. Embedded in that sentence is the idea that youthfulness is the standard, and deviation from it requires reassurance. The person receiving the comment is put in the strange position of either accepting the compliment—which means agreeing that ageing badly would be unfortunate—or rejecting it and risking social awkwardness.
Then there’s the question: “How does it feel to be older?” This one is trickier, because sometimes it’s genuine curiosity, and sometimes it’s thinly veiled anxiety. What people often want to know is whether being older feels as bad as they fear it will. They’re asking for a preview, a warning, or maybe even permission to relax.
The problem with all these exchanges is not malice. It’s simplification.
We like clean narratives about ageing. Either it’s tragic and downhill, or it’s empowering and irrelevant. Either you’re falling apart, or you’re “ageing like fine wine.” Both stories flatten the truth. Both leave little room for contradiction, and ageing is full of contradictions.
You can be mentally sharper and emotionally calmer than you were in your twenties, and still need to sit down halfway up a flight of stairs. You can be deeply grateful for your body and frustrated with it in the same afternoon. You can exercise regularly, eat well, sleep decently, and still feel the quiet accumulation of wear. None of this means you are failing. It means you are alive.
Gerontologist Margaret Gullette has written extensively about what she calls “age ideology”—the stories societies tell about what ageing is supposed to mean. In many modern cultures, ageing is framed as loss: loss of beauty, relevance, energy, desirability. The anti-ageing industry thrives on this fear, offering creams, supplements, routines, and attitudes designed to help us outrun time. But ageing is not a personal flaw to be corrected. It is a universal process that happens unevenly and often inconveniently.
Medical research supports this unevenness. Studies on sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass, show that it can begin as early as the thirties, but its progression varies widely. Research on lung capacity demonstrates a gradual decline over adulthood, which can explain breathlessness even in otherwise healthy individuals. Osteoarthritis can develop without dramatic injury, simply through years of use. Vision changes such as presbyopia are so common they’re practically a rite of passage. These changes are not moral verdicts. They are physiological realities.
So what do we say instead?
Maybe we stop trying to neutralize age altogether. Maybe we respond in ways that acknowledge difference without ranking it.
When someone says, “You don’t look your age,” a response doesn’t have to be defensive or dismissive. It can be curious. It can be grounding. Something like, “I think age looks different on everyone,” or even, “This is just what my age looks like on me.” That small shift quietly challenges the idea that there is a correct way to appear at any given number.
When asked, “How does it feel to be older?” we don’t owe anyone a polished summary or a motivational speech. We can tell the truth, gently and incompletely, the way truth often is. “Some things feel easier, some things feel harder. My body has opinions now.” Or, “It feels layered. Not worse, not better. Just more.” These answers resist drama without denying reality.
And when someone talks about the ways their body is changing, maybe the kindest response is not reassurance at all. Maybe it’s recognition. “That sounds frustrating.” “That makes sense.” “I’ve noticed changes too.” According to research on empathy and social connection, particularly the work of Brené Brown and others studying vulnerability, people feel more supported when their experiences are acknowledged rather than reframed. Validation does not make pain worse; it makes it less lonely.
There is also a quiet ableism tucked inside the phrase “age is just a number.” It assumes that a body that doesn’t hurt, doesn’t slow down, doesn’t need accommodation, is the baseline. Anyone who deviates from that baseline is encouraged to transcend it with positivity. But bodies are not problems to be solved by attitude. Disability scholars and ageing researchers alike have pointed out that many of the hardships associated with ageing come not from physical changes themselves, but from environments that are unwilling to adapt. Stairs without railings, work cultures that equate stamina with worth, social expectations that reward endurance over care.
Ageing does not happen in isolation. It happens in context.
What complicates this further is that many people experience ageing long before it becomes socially visible. Chronic stress, caregiving, poverty, trauma, and discrimination all accelerate biological ageing. Research on allostatic load—the cumulative wear and tear on the body from repeated stress—shows that marginalised groups often show signs of accelerated ageing at a cellular level. Telomere studies, while still evolving, suggest that prolonged stress can affect cellular ageing itself. So when we dismiss someone’s experience with “age is just a number,” we may also be dismissing histories we cannot see.
This doesn’t mean we have to speak about ageing in hushed, tragic tones. There is joy here too. Many studies in psychology suggest that emotional regulation improves with age. Older adults often report greater life satisfaction, deeper relationships, and a clearer sense of what matters. The U-shaped happiness curve, observed across multiple countries, suggests that wellbeing often dips in midlife and rises again later. Ageing is not a single story moving in one direction. It is several stories happening at once.
Which is why the most honest way to talk about age might be to let it stay complex.
Instead of “age is just a number,” we might say: age is information. It tells us something, but not everything. It interacts with our bodies, our histories, our environments, and our expectations. It deserves curiosity more than correction.
Instead of praising people for not “looking” their age, we might learn to decouple appearance from value altogether. Instead of asking people to sum up what it feels like to be older, we might make space for answers that don’t resolve neatly.
Ageing humbles us. It teaches us that control was always partial. That resilience is not about resisting change, but negotiating with it. That compassion—toward others and toward ourselves—matters more than clever slogans.
I think back to my friend now, and I wish I had responded differently. I wish I had said, “That sounds hard,” and let the conversation unfold from there. I didn’t know then what I know now. But maybe that’s also part of ageing: realizing that some of our best intentions were incomplete, and choosing to speak more carefully going forward.
My knees still ache on long walks. The stairs still ask more of me than they used to. None of this makes me old in any absolute sense, and none of it makes me young either. It just makes me here, in this body, at this point in time. And that feels like a better place to start the conversation than pretending numbers don’t matter at all.
Written by: Adi Jamaludin
0 comments:
Post a Comment