Youth Day is one of those calendar moments that feels deceptively simple. A day. A label. A holiday, sometimes. In Singapore, it often comes packaged with school celebrations, performances, awards ceremonies, and a familiar speech about potential. Other times, it passes quietly, barely noticed by anyone who has already crossed a certain age threshold and is now firmly lodged in the land of adulthood, responsibility, and CPF statements.
But Youth Day was never meant to be just a date. It was meant to be a declaration.
At its most basic, Youth Day is a recognition of young people as a distinct social force — not merely as children-in-waiting or adults-in-training, but as individuals who are actively shaping culture, politics, economies, and futures. The United Nations defines youth broadly, often placing it between the ages of 15 and 24, though many countries stretch or compress that range depending on social realities. In Singapore, “youth” can sometimes feel like a flexible term — you are young when policies need to invest in you, and suddenly very grown-up when expectations need to be imposed.
The idea behind Youth Day, globally, is to pause and acknowledge that societies do not move forward on policies alone. They move forward because young people carry ideas, restlessness, resistance, and hope — often all at once.
And yet, how we see youth says a lot about who we are.
In many Western contexts, youth is frequently framed as a time of exploration and self-definition. There is a cultural acceptance — sometimes even encouragement — of wandering. Gap years. Career switches. The idea that your twenties are meant for finding yourself before you settle into anything resembling permanence. The American writer Ralph Waldo Emerson once wrote, “Youth is a period of missed opportunities,” not as a condemnation, but as an acknowledgement that experimentation inevitably involves wrong turns.
Failure, in that framing, is part of the curriculum.
In many Asian societies, however, youth has historically been seen less as a phase of exploration and more as a phase of preparation. Or, more bluntly, production. Youth is where you gather skills quickly, discipline yourself thoroughly, and prove your economic worth early. Time is not to be “found”; it is to be optimised. There is often an unspoken anxiety beneath it all — that youth is a diminishing resource, and that if it is not converted into credentials, income, or status quickly enough, it will be wasted.
This is where the uncomfortable word enters the conversation: commodity.
In parts of Asia, youth is frequently treated as human capital. Something to be trained, deployed, and measured. Education systems become pipelines. Productivity becomes a moral virtue. A young person’s value is sometimes assessed less by who they are becoming and more by how soon they can contribute to GDP, family stability, or national competitiveness.
This isn’t to say that the West doesn’t commodify youth — it does, particularly through consumer culture and media. But the commodification looks different. In the West, youth is often sold as an aesthetic: beauty, rebellion, novelty. In Asia, youth is often sold as labour and potential output.
Both have costs.
When Youth Day first emerged in many countries during the mid-to-late 20th century, its spirit was closer to political recognition than celebration. International Youth Day, established by the United Nations and observed on 12 August, grew out of conversations about youth participation, unemployment, education access, and civic engagement. It wasn’t about performances and banners. It was about listening.
That listening looked very different in the 1980s.
If you were a youth in the 80s, the world felt slower but heavier. There was less talk of mental health, fewer platforms to speak out, and far more emphasis on conformity. In Singapore, the 80s were a period of nation-building pragmatism. Youth were expected to study hard, stay out of trouble, and trust that stability would follow obedience. The social contract was clear: do your part early, and the system will take care of you later.
Youth voices existed, but they were rarely amplified. Expression happened in limited spaces — classrooms, community centres, maybe theatre groups if you were lucky. Mistakes were quieter. So were conversations about burnout, identity, and pressure.
Fast forward to today, and the youth landscape has shifted dramatically.
Young people now grow up in a world of constant visibility. Every opinion can be posted. Every failure can be archived. The pressure is no longer just to succeed, but to succeed publicly. A young person today is expected to be resilient, innovative, socially aware, emotionally intelligent, and employable — preferably all at once.
The American writer and activist James Baldwin once said, “The children are always ours; every generation, whatever it is, must figure out what it means to be human.” Today’s youth are figuring that out in real time, under surveillance, in a hyper-competitive world, while being told repeatedly that they are both the hope of the future and the cause of present problems.
Youth Day, in this context, cannot simply be celebratory. It has to be reflective.
It has to ask: are we celebrating youth for who they are, or for what they can become for us?
This question becomes even more interesting when we realise that Youth Day is not celebrated on the same date across the globe — and in some places, not celebrated at all.
International Youth Day on 12 August exists, but many countries choose their own dates, tied to national histories, political movements, or cultural milestones. China observes Youth Day on 4 May, commemorating the May Fourth Movement — a student-led protest that reshaped modern Chinese intellectual and political life. South Africa marks Youth Day on 16 June, in remembrance of the 1976 Soweto Uprising, where students protested against apartheid education policies and paid with their lives. In these contexts, Youth Day is not light-hearted. It is solemn. It remembers that youth have always been capable of courage and resistance.
Then there are countries where Youth Day does not exist as a formal observance at all. In some nations, youth issues are folded into education days, labour days, or national celebrations. In others, the absence speaks volumes — youth are expected to assimilate quickly into adulthood without a distinct social identity in between.
The presence or absence of Youth Day tells us something important: whether a society sees youth as worth pausing for.
And pausing matters.
Because when youth is treated purely as a transitional phase — something to “get through” quickly — we miss the opportunity to learn from young people in the present tense. We forget that youth are not just future leaders. They are current witnesses. They see the contradictions we have normalised. They ask the questions we’ve grown tired of asking.
The writer Ursula K. Le Guin once remarked that “the trouble is that we have a bad habit, encouraged by pedants and sophisticates, of considering happiness as something rather stupid.” The same could be said of idealism. Youth is often dismissed as naive precisely because it still believes things could be otherwise.
Perhaps that is why Youth Day makes adults uncomfortable.
Because to truly honour youth is to admit that the world we’ve built may not be enough. That the systems we defend may be the very ones young people are struggling under. That productivity without meaning, success without rest, and resilience without support are hollow victories.
So what should Youth Day be today?
Not a performance for young people, but a conversation with them. Not a reminder of expectations, but an acknowledgement of pressures. Not a celebration of potential alone, but a recognition of presence.
Youth are not commodities. They are not raw material for economic growth. They are human beings navigating a world they did not design, yet are constantly asked to fix.
If Youth Day is to mean anything, it must resist the urge to instrumentalise youth. It must make room for voices that are uncertain, tired, angry, creative, and still figuring things out. It must honour youth not just for their energy, but for their questions.
Because youth, at its core, is not about age.
It is about standing at the edge of possibility — and daring to imagine that the world can be gentler, fairer, and more human than the one handed to you.
And that, perhaps, is worth celebrating.
Written by: Adi Jamaludin
0 comments:
Post a Comment